How Will AI Change the Future of SEO?


 How Will AI Change the Future of SEO?

Artificial intelligence (AI) is penetrating every department of every industry, from automating factory work to improving areas previously thought untouchable by machines (like human resources). But as a veteran in the online marketing world, I can’t help but let my imagination wander on how AI and machine learning are going to impact the world of search engine optimization (SEO)—the strategies organizations use to rank higher in search engine results pages (SERPs).

Already, we’re seeing the beginnings of a full-scale AI revolution in SEO, and search marketers are scrambling to keep pace with the changes. But what will the next few years bring? What about the next decade?

The Big Picture:
We say “search engines,” but most of the time, we’re talking about Google. Bing, Yahoo!, DuckDuckGo, and other engines only share a fraction of the search user base, and most of their systems are modeled after Google’s in the first place. So our big question is, how is Google going to incorporate AI in the future to change how search works for the average user?

Historically, Google has updated its algorithms with two primary goals in mind:

  • ·         Improve user experience. Google wants users to find the answers they’re looking for, and receive accurate, valuable content. This is an important category, and a complicated one; to achieve this, Google not only has to perfect how its search engine functions, but also how it finds, organizes, and evaluates the quality of content on the web.
  • ·         Keep users on Google. Google makes money when people use it, and stay on the platform as long as possible. We’ll see why that’s important in a future section.

Google is already making use of machine learning in a few different ways, and it’s only a matter of time before it advances.

RankBrain and Machine Learning:

First, let’s consider RankBrain, a machine learning-based upgrade to Google’s Hummingbird algorithm, which launched in 2015. The Hummingbird update, from 2013, originally rolled out “semantic search” capabilities. It was designed to evaluate the context of user queries, rather than the exact contents; rather than prioritizing exact match keywords, Hummingbird allowed Google to consider synonyms, related phrases, and more. This was a step in the right direction, because it meant users could find better results, and search optimizers could no longer get away with keyword stuffing.
RankBrain was a modification that allowed Google to study massive quantities of user search data and automatically improve its interpretation of user phrases. It was primarily focused on long, convoluted, or hard-to-understand phrases, ultimately reducing them down to a length and simplicity level the algorithm could more easily handle. It’s been self-updating and improving ever since.

This is an important indication of how search will evolve in the future; I’m guessing that rather than seeing manual update after manual update, we’ll see more algorithm changes designed to self-update based on machine learning insights. This is much faster and less costly than having humans doing all the work.

Content Quality and Link Quality:

I suspect we’ll also see major AI advancements applied to better understand the quality of the content and links produced by search optimizers.
Links and content are the focal points of most SEOstrategies. Google studies links to calculate domain- and page-level authority (or trustworthiness); generally, the more links a site has pointed to it, and the better those links are, the higher it’s going to rank. Similarly, better-written, more relevant content tends to rise in SERP rankings—and appeal to web users. Better content and better links mean you’ll end up with a higher return on investment (ROI) for your SEO strategy.
Over the years, Google has gotten better at analyzing the quality of content and links from websites; search marketers have evolved from trying to trick Google’s algorithm to simply trying to produce their best possible work.
Right now, Google’s methods for evaluating the subjective “quality” of content and links are good—but they could always be better. It would be easier for an AI agent to gradually learn what makes good content “good,” than to rely on a manual agent coding those parameters into a system. I believe Google will make more efforts to automate quality evaluation in the near future.

Individualization:

Google has also taken great efforts to individualize its search results. If you search for the same phrase in Phoenix, Arizona and Cleveland, Ohio, you’re probably going to get radically different results. You may also get different results based on your search history, and even the demographic information Google “knows” about you.
Right now, these individualization efforts are impressive, but limited. We’re not surprised that Google knows where we are, or the last few things we’ve searched for. But in the near future, Google may be capable of using AI to make more intensive predictions. Based on your historical searches and search data from millions of other users like you, Google may be able to recommend searches or search results before you even know you need them.
For search marketers, this is both an opportunity and a threat. If you can capitalize on predictive searches, you can get a massive edge on the competition—but then again, if Google’s algorithmic methods are opaque, you may have a hard time understanding how and when your results appear for users.

Smart Results:

Over the past few years, Google has stepped up its efforts to keep users on the SERPs, rather than clicking links to visit other websites. The Knowledge Graph and rich snippets now appear to provide immediate answers to user queries, preventing the need to click any further. As Google gets better at dissecting user queries with RankBrain and Hummingbird, and becomes better at parsing the web with smart algorithms, I suspect we’ll see even more of these user-attention-grabbing entries.

For search marketers, this is again both an opportunity and a threat. If you can game the system and get your content to appear in the SERPs above your competitors’, you’ll get a major boost to your brand reputation. But at the same time, if users stay in the SERPs, and never visit, you’ll miss out on a ton of organic traffic.

Real Time Changes and Adaptability:

AI is remarkably good at analyzing vast amounts of data, and far faster than even an experienced human team. Historically, Google has made periodic updates to its algorithm with major, game-changing algorithm changes dropped every few months. But recently, those algorithm updates have tapered off in favor of much smaller, much more frequent updates.
This trend will likely develop further in the future as Google’s AI systems optimize toward real-time analytics. It will “learn” constantly, with every new search query, and possibly roll new updates to its live algorithm on a constant basis, making it difficult to keep up with its iterative evolution.

Content Production and Onsite Optimization:

It’s also worth noting that AI won’t just be harnessed by Google and other search engines. We’ll also see the development and utility of AI on behalf of search marketers. AI-based content generators are becoming more advanced and more common; eventually, search marketers may be able to use them to produce and distribute content good enough to “fool” Google’s algorithms. From there, this will likely turn into an arms race between search marketers and search algorithms—not too unlike what we already have.

Furthermore, smart onsite optimization engines could greatly simplify the technical efforts that search marketers currently have to make. Current plugins and onsite SEO tools are helpful, but incomplete; in the near future, AI and machine learning could make these substantially more capable.
Overall, it’s unlikely that we’ll see such a radical transformation that SERPs become unrecognizable, or that SEO disappears as an online marketing strategy. However, search marketers and users will both have to make some serious adjustments if they’re going to stay relevant as AI infiltrates this space.

Background on Heading Tags for SEO

How to Use Heading Elements?

Background on Heading Tags for SEO

In the early 2000s, heading elements (H1, H2, H3) were actual ranking factors. It was mandatory to add your keywords in the headings if you wanted to rank.
But that’s not been the case for many years. Yet, it is a common SEO practice to worry about keywords in the heading tags.
The word “rote” means doing something mechanically and out of habit, without thinking about it. Adding keywords to headings tags has become a rote SEO practice. It’s done not because it’s useful but because it’s a habit. Take a look at the top ranked sites for most any query and it’s highly likely you won’t see sites seeding heading tags with keywords.

The Right Way to Use Heading Tags

What John Mueller takes time to explain is that heading tags are are useful for explaining what the text is about, which is the purpose of heading tags.

This is how Mueller explains it:
But rather, what we use these headings for is well we have this big chunk of text or we have this big image and there’s a heading above that, therefore maybe this heading applies to this chunk of text or to this image.
So it’s not so much like there are five keywords in these headings, therefore this page will rank for these keywords but more, here’s some more information about that piece of text or about that image on that page.
And that helps us to better understand how to kind of frame that piece of text, how to frame the images that you have within those blocks. And with that it’s a lot easier to find… the right queries that lead us to these pages.

Heading Tags No Longer Ranking Factors?

Heading tags have made the top ten lists of ranking factors for several decades. But if you look at the search engine results pages (SERPs) you’ll see that’s not the case. Anyone who argues otherwise is denying what exists in front of their eyes.
The proper use of heading tags has changed. The proper use is to help search engines understand what the content is about. That’s it.
Mueller explains that keywords in headings are not required for ranking:
So it’s not so much that suddenly your page ranks higher because you have those keywords there. But suddenly it’s more well Google understands my content a little bit better and therefore it can send users who are explicitly looking for my content a little bit more towards my page.
Mueller then returns to explaining the proper use of heading tags:
“So obviously there’s a little bit of overlap there with regards to… Google understanding my content better and me ranking better for the queries that I care about. Because if you write about content that you want to rank for which probably you’re doing, then being able to understand that content better does help us a little bit.
But it’s not that suddenly your page will rank number one for competitive queries just because you’re making it very easy for Google to understand your content.
So with that said, I think it’s useful to… look at the individual headings on a page but… don’t get too dug down into all of these details and variations and instead try to find a way to make it easy for people and for scripts to understand the content and kind of the context of things on your pages.
Article Source From - https://www.searchenginejournal.com/heading-tags-for-seo/341817


 

Featured Post

Why Digital Marketing is Important for Today’s Business

The onset of the Internet has given a new dimension to the idea of marketing. Earlier, advertising was once all about making a bit of advice...